... misdirection ... January 27, 2008
In the New International Version of the Bible, the first appearance
of the dubious (and infamous) word hell is found in Matthew
But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca,’ is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fires of hell.
In the King James Version, the first instance of this dread word appears in Deuteronomy 32:22:
For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.
It is my fervent belief that the English word hell should not appear in either verse - in any translation. As a matter of fact, I question the use of the word in the Bible at all. I consider its presence an egregious faux pas in translation.
There are four different words that are translated as the English word hell:
A proper translation of these words would give consideration to cultural distinctions, distinctions (we should bear in mind) separated by thousands of years. The Greeks, for example, did not infer from Hades what we do from hell.
To the Greeks, Hades was a term derived from their acknowledged
mythology. To the average citizen of the modern era (at least in the West
and Middle East), hell is most definitely not
mythological (or metaphorical). To translate Hades, therefore, as
hell is to virtually tell a white lie, as if the translators are
trying to pull the proverbial wool over our eyes.
The best way to handle the cultural distinctions inherent in these words is to not translate them at all, but to transliterate them. If we were to do that, the first verse above would appear as follows:
But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fires of Gehenna.
The second would read much as the NIV offers it:
For a fire has been kindled by my wrath,
one that burns to Sheol below.
It will devour the earth and its harvests
and set afire the foundations of the mountains.
In the NIV, the word Sheol is properly translated as realm of death. This is also the correct translation for Hades. In fact, Hades is the New Testament equivalent of Sheol.
If we are translating the words, we should take care to do it properly. We should not simply substitute an English word that we think captures the correct translation. To do so is to step outside the bounds of the translating task and venture into the realm of interpretation, or paraphrase.
Translators should not interpret; they should translate.
If we are somehow reluctant about translating Hades as realm of the dead, or (even simpler) the grave, then we should simply insert the literal word itself - Hades.
How many have been led astray (not to mention utterly terrified) just because of sheer laziness on the part of a translator? If the translation were handled the way it is should be, we would never read the word "hell" in the Bible - not anywhere.
We should view it as of utmost importance to make every effort to completely dispel the myth of hell that is so neurotically embraced by our culture. If such myth were sufficiently discredited, the silliness of Christianity (and Islam) would disappear from the face of the earth. And nothing could more improve the general condition of mankind than to completely discredit these patently absurd (and, truth be told, sister) ideologies.
There is little doubt that Hell (with a capital H) is the only reason that anyone is a Christian or a Muslim in the first place. It is without question the strongest link in the chain that virtually enslaves them to their much-touted religions.